How Healthcare Companies Can Share Data Safely for Offshore Testing and Development

Learn how Protecto helps healthcare companies safely share PHI for offshore testing and development, ensuring data integrity and HIPAA compliance.
How Healthcare Companies Can Share Data Safely for Offshore Testing and Development

Table of Contents

Data sharing for offshore testing, development, and other operational needs is often essential in the healthcare industry. Yet, laws governing Protected Health Information (PHI) make this challenging, as sending sensitive data outside the U.S. can introduce significant regulatory risks. To stay compliant, healthcare companies need solutions that can anonymize data without compromising its usability or accuracy. 

The Limitations of Synthetic Data for Healthcare Use Cases 

Many organizations attempt to bypass these restrictions with synthetic data, hoping it can be a safe stand-in for real patient information. However, synthetic data often lacks crucial aspects of data integrity. Preserving relationships such as age-to-dosage dependencies and maintaining primary and foreign key references is essential in healthcare.

Without these, synthetic data can lead to inaccurate testing, high-risk situations, and a lack of reliability. Such complex integrity requirements create a serious gap for healthcare companies, as they cannot ensure meaningful results with synthetic data alone. 

Interested Read: Leveraging Synthetic Data: Strategic Benefits & Use Cases

Why Traditional Anonymization Tools Fall Short 

Some healthcare organizations turn to traditional in-house or older data anonymization tools to mask sensitive information. However, these solutions often break data integrity, similar to synthetic data, rendering the data ineffective for accurate testing and analysis. When anonymization tools fail to preserve data structure and key relationships, they compromise the quality of insights teams need for effective development and testing. 

Interested Read: A Comprehensive Guide to HIPAA Compliance in the Age of AI

Protecto: A Solution for Integrity-Preserving Data Masking 

Protecto addresses these challenges by providing format-preserving, length- and type-preserving masking that retains the original data’s structure. With Protecto, healthcare organizations can anonymize data while preserving critical aspects such as primary-foreign key relationships and dependencies like age-to-dosage ratios. This allows healthcare teams to confidently use anonymized data for offshore testing and development, knowing that the data integrity remains intact. 

Many Real-World Success Stories 

Many healthcare analytics companies leverage Protecto to create anonymized data for offshore development and testing, saving millions in development costs and significantly improving testing quality. Protecto provided the support this company needed to scale its testing and operations without compromising data security by enabling HIPAA-compliant, secure data sharing. 

Conclusion 

For healthcare companies facing challenges in safely sharing PHI, Protecto offers a unique, effective solution. By retaining data integrity, Protecto ensures that anonymized data is as reliable as the original—enabling compliance, operational efficiency, and high-quality testing. Protecto might be the answer to unlock safe, compliant, and effective offshore data use if your team struggles with data-sharing restrictions. 

Amar Kanagaraj
Founder and CEO of Protecto
Amar Kanagaraj, Founder and CEO of Protecto, is a visionary leader in privacy, data security, and trust in the emerging AI-centric world, with over 20 years of experience in technology and business leadership.Prior to Protecto, Amar co-founded Filecloud, an enterprise B2B software startup, where he put it on a trajectory to hit $10M in revenue as CMO.

Related Articles

Entropy vs. Encryption: Which Tokenization is Better?

Entropy vs. Encryption: Which Tokenization is Better?

How LLM Privacy Tech Is Transforming AI

How LLM Privacy Tech Is Transforming AI Using Cutting-Edge Tech

Understanding the Impact of AI on User Consent and Data Collection